Recently, I noticed a message from Mike Boudet on Facebook, dating back to 2014, regarding the case of Morgan Ingram. It’s astonishing that I’m only now discovering it, as I seldom check the other folder on Facebook. In hindsight, I realize I should make it a point to do so more often. Had I seen his interview request sooner, I would have welcomed the opportunity to engage in dialogue regarding the murder of Morgan Ingram.
While I suspect that Mike is friends with Tricia from Websleuths, that’s beside the point. What truly matters is the chance to discuss the intricacies of the case. However, I firmly believe that Mike should prioritize conversations with Toni Ingram and her family—particularly Toni’s husband and Morgan’s father, Steve Ingram, and Toni’s son and Morgan’s brother, Ryan Ingram—over any other voices because their voices matter more so. I’m just a journalist with an opinion. I’m not an investigator nor a professional when it comes to criminology and crime in general. I’ve made this clear so many times before.
Listening to the podcast episodes left me with a strong impression of bias. Almost immediately, if I’m being honest. The use of ad hominem attacks against myself and Toni, redundant red herrings, and outright fabrications is so glaringly apparent. It was evident that Mike had a specific agenda, attempting to portray Toni Ingram and myself as liars who are unstable, irrational, and crazy because we believe Keenan Vanginkel murdered Morgan Ingram. The sensationalism was palpable and I could almost hear the grift resonating through my headphones.
I have meticulously addressed each lie propagated in the podcast here on my blog way before he and his guests attempted to spread lies using the Sword and Scale platform, refuting the misinformation surrounding both Toni and myself for supporting her. Truth to be told, both episodes felt scripted and Mike’s monotonous, robotic delivery did little to lend it credibility. If he were a legitimate podcaster, as he claims, he would have sought to interview Toni directly or those intimately connected to the case, such as Dr. Michael Dobersen, rather than relying on armchair investigators to perpetuate a false narrative while encouraging apophenia. Also diagnosing Mrs. Ingram as having Münchausen syndrome is projection. Not only is this a false diagnosis of a grieving mother searching for answers, this is the archetype of brain diseased armchair investigators and why they should never be taken seriously at all. Their narratives alone are like shaggy dog stories.
The only audience likely to resonate with these specific podcast episodes appear to be those who romanticize the macabre—individuals who indulge in sensationalized narratives about crime. The content was rife with absurd conspiracy theory, curated by armchair grifters who exploit a tragic murder for entertainment. It’s a disheartening spectacle. The use of internet stalker storyteller MacGuffin Odegard glorified even more lies including his crazed apophenia. This unhinged clown has zero relation to Morgan Ingram’s stalking, murder, and case in general. What a spectacle this has become.
Episodes 11 and 12 are saturated with inaccuracies and bias. They are both total shit and do not represent the facts about the Morgan Ingram case at all; rather, they are misinterpretations and sensationalized accounts by communal narcissists who think they are the loudest voices online, who believe they are 100% right and attempt to devalue innocent people and poison public opinion with their lies. The same unhinged trash who try to refute doctors and professionals, while attacking those who share a different perspective. The same losers who have convinced themselves that their research triumphs forensic pathologists with actual degrees in the field because they share ignoratio elenchi and think distorting the facts makes they superior to a true academic in the field. Armchair sleuths are not genuine investigators; they often consist of lonely, uninformed individuals who exploit cases and misinterpret the evidence 90% of the time. I refuse to be drawn into their narrative and I implore you to exercise discernment as well. Don’t be fooled because I definitely am not.
Comments