This is a compelling, previously unreleased interview with psychic medium and clairvoyant Angela Spicer, in which she provides her perspectives on the tragic murder of Caylee Anthony, a young girl from Orlando, Florida, who mysteriously disappeared on July 15, 2008. Her remains were discovered in December of that same year. During our conversation, Angela had no prior knowledge of the case, and true to form, our dialogue was spontaneous. We conducted the interview using only an iPhone 4s via FaceTime.
I first encountered Angela at a casino in Dillon, Montana, in late 2009, and our friendship flourished over the years as she offered me numerous readings, including profound reflections on my grandmother, who passed away a decade prior to speaking with her. Angela's untimely passing in January 2018 left a significant void in the lives of many, including my own.
Since our discussion in late 2014 regarding the Caylee Anthony case, I have felt a compelling need to share this reading. Although I recorded our conversation, it remained unreleased online—until now. What follows is the complete interview, presented in its entirety. Without further delay, here is psychic Angela Spicer's reading on the Caylee Anthony case.
Sarah: We meet again. Always a joy to speak with you.
Angela: I know. I should probably start charging you. Just kidding. *laughs*
Sarah: You are one of the few psychics who doesn’t ask for money nor take money from anyone.
Angela: I’m happy to help. Especially if my readings can help someone or guide them in the right direction.
Sarah: I'm not sure if you're familiar with Caylee Anthony or the details of her case. She was a young girl from Orlando, Florida, who mysteriously vanished and captured national attention when she went missing on July 15, 2008. Her remains were found on December 11, 2008 according to court documents and officially identified on December 19, 2008. With numerous unanswered questions, the case has given rise to various theories, with a significant portion of the public believing that her mother, Casey, was responsible for her death.
Angela: Interesting. I don’t read the news so I’m not sure who she is. This kind of thing happens often. Very tragic.
Sarah: Indeed, it is. The trial of her mother, Casey Anthony, commenced on May 24, 2011, and concluded on July 5, 2011, several years after Caylee went missing, her remains were discovered, and finally her remains identified. Jury selection began on May 9, 2011. After more than 10 hours of deliberation, the jury returned a verdict of not guilty on all charges, declaring Casey completely innocent. Today, I’m seeking your insights on what happened to Caylee Anthony.
Angela: I see a little girl and she’s stepping forward. She’s so adorable.
Sarah: She is! She is so adorable. The entire case is so sad. To think she was murdered is absolutely devastating and tragic.
Angela: She has beautiful eyes. She’s telling me she loves her mom. Did her mom go out the night she disappeared? Did her mom leave Caylee with two grown men?
Sarah: I don’t know.
Angela: I’m getting the name Nathan or Nate. Also the name Quin or Clint. I see one of these two men that Casey left her daughter with assaulted her. I think Nate or Nathan is the one who did it. Caylee would not stop crying so he strangled her. He has brown hair and it looks shaved. Kind of a longer nose and very odd eyebrows.
Sarah: Oh my God. This is horrible. Are you getting any last names?
Angela: Not right now. The guy is or was a friend of Casey’s. Nathan is the name I’m getting.
Sarah: Did Casey go out to a club while these two men watched her daughter? Do you know what she did?
Angela: Yeah. I’m certain.
Sarah: Casey was found completely innocent. Do you know why?
Angela: She is innocent and was found innocent because she isn’t guilty. I can tell you one of the things that determined her innocence was because of the keystrokes. When whoever investigated the case checked on the searches made on the computer, they realized how different they were. I’m seeing this Nate or Nathan guy on her computer. I’m not seeing specific searches. I am being shown him sitting at the computer logged onto Google.
Sarah: I have heard vaguely about the internet searches she made. I do believe there were a few she allegedly made on family computer.
Angela: I’m not being shown that.
Sarah: So, Casey is completely innocent?
Angela: If innocent means she did not kill her daughter, it means she didn’t do it. She is innocent. But if innocent means, she was dumb to go out and party at a club while leaving her child with a sexual predator, then no, she is not innocent.
Sarah: Why would Casey go out and party while leaving her child with a grown man?
Angela: I think she trusts or trusted the man originally. She was also one of those promiscuous party girls. I know he (Nate) was a friend of hers. I am getting his last name, but I can’t make it out.
Sarah: Is it Nathan Lezniewicz?
Angela: Caylee is telling me it’s him.
Sarah: From my understanding, he was a witness in the trial. He use to live with Casey’s then boyfriend Anthony Lazzaro. Clint House is the other man, I think who was a witness. They were roommates with Casey’s then boyfriend.
Angela: Yeah. I got the name Quin or Clint earlier.
Sarah: I would have never suspected he (Nathan) was guilty at all. I always thought she was.
Angela: She’s not guilty.
Sarah: Why would Nathan do this to Caylee? Will he ever be charged with the crime?
Angela: He’s very sick and twisted. I don’t want to try and understand why he and other predators act the way they do. I don’t ever see him being charged. Because her mother was a promiscuous party girl, most believe she did it and I think the focus will be on her. It’s something she will have to deal with probably forever.
Sarah: She’s indirectly guilty if she didn’t properly screen who was watching her child.
Angela: That’s true actually.
Sarah: Thank you for doing this reading today. I appreciate you. Thank you for your work.
Angela: It is no problem. You are very welcome.
In 2011, Casey Anthony was acquitted of the murder of her daughter, Caylee Anthony, a verdict that elicited intense media scrutiny and provoked significant public discourse on the intricacies of the legal system and the evidentiary standards at play. Although she was exonerated of the most grave charges, she was found guilty on four counts of providing false information to law enforcement. Despite providing witness testimony, Nathan Lezniewicz has never been charged nor linked to this crime. Casey Anthony was acquitted in a court of law on July 5, 2011. Please do not harass any individuals mentioned in this interview. The real question remains; however—will there ever be justice for Caylee Anthony? One can only hope.
This interview is protected under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, Section 9 of the Idaho Constitution, and Senate Bill 1001.
Comments