I have been receiving several emails from people who read my blogs asking me what my thoughts were about the latest interview Piers Morgan did with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad about a week or so ago.
First and foremost, I thought the questions were quite boring, moderately self indulgent, and well, a little banal which left me disappointed. As much as I enjoy Piers Morgan, this interview was definitely not one of my favorites.
I have to admit, I thought that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad spoke relatively
prudently despite the fact that I don't agree with several things that he says.
He does appear slightly cunning, but who are we to determine such? If anything,
he is guilty of being modestly outspoken. I think as a political figure, he
seems dramatically ambitious, especially on his emphasis on reform. With that
said, I don't understand why people use religion as a weapon to justify an
I don't agree with a lot of what Mr. Ahmadinejad says, but I don't see him
encouraging the conflict created by distorted international relations. This kind of distortion is created by those that love exaggerating to create afflictions to test allies and prevent political stability. I don't see Mahmoud Ahmadinejad as a threat. In fact, I think the most threatening individual(s) are those that we don't know. Yes, the "personality" that is evil is one that we will not see until something does happen. There is no connection to what one believes is "obvious" simply because that person's decorum is embellished and tested by media and the status quo masses that follow.
I am proud to be an American, but I truly believe the
reality is this; the killing of millions of individuals for the sake of
thousands contradicts and undermines human's natural rights to a sizable degree
of social harm. It is wrong and should never be supported as ok. I think the only solution to
this issue is for allies of the countries to simply stop meddling into
political affairs they are not a part of.