Comments I would never make on my own blog

This is the latest comment I received on my website today regarding the stalking and murder of Morgan Ingram. As you can see, the person who commented is using my actual name and identity (Sarah Afshar) and linking directly to this site to comment on my own blog. This is identity theft and to make matters worse, they are posting a comment I would never post.

This is what I have been dealing with for years. For four years to be exact. 

I have received quite a few hate comments and recently, have been told by two concerned readers who I don't even know personally, that I am being impersonated. They also shared that both Ms. Martinez and Ms. Griffith have tried to get me swatted by law enforcement. The problem is, the address that they posted years ago linked to Butte, Montana has not been my address since Fall of 2012. That house was very run down and unlivable hence why I only lived there a few months before making the move to Bozeman where I lived from Fall 2012 until 2013. After Bozeman, I relocated to West Yellowstone. Currently, I live in Meridian, Idaho and I have been here since early 2015. 

To continue their scam, someone (Mayra Martinez, who I suspect as she has a history of harassing and stalking people who disagree with her or Tricia from Websleuths) even had the audacity to troll me and ask why I am harassing Mike Boudet of Sword and Scale using my own name. To answer this question—No. I am not harassing anyone nor have I ever harassed anyone. Especially in regards to the Morgan Ingram case. This is a lie. On that note, I have addressed Mayra Martinez (or MayraMM) several years ago. You can read more about this internet stalker here.

 

First of all, the podcast episodes Mr. Boudet did regarding Morgan Ingram (episode 11 and 12, I do believe) were riddled with gaslighting, ignoratio elenchi, ad hominem, red herring, and bias discrediting tactics not to mention lies and exaggeration. I felt like the explosive true crime host was doing a personal favor for his friend Tricia Griffith of Websleuths. Keep in mind, there is a Tricia Griffith who is the CEO of Progressive. This is not the same woman who owns the Websleuths forum. To be honest, the lies on these two podcast episodes are so extremely outrageous; however, what I found appalling about them was how poorly researched they actually were. I am also kind of surprised because Boudet interviewed Mayra Martinez (or MayraMM) and Tricia Griffith of Websleuths, two armchair trolls who are simply part of an online cabal dedicated to discrediting and mocking Toni Ingram and the homicide theory, but I was not shocked nor am I in shock today as that is to be expected. I believe everyone is entitled to an opinion, whether you disagree with them or not. Sadly, the narrative pushed on the Sword and Scale podcast in regards to the Morgan Ingram case was filled with lies. Yes, lies. Separating fact from fiction, it's incontrovertibly clear he would have had better luck talking to Morgan's mother Mrs. Ingram and Morgan's stalker Mr. Vanginkel rather than three scorned sleuthhounds who didn't really discuss her death. 

What is even more baffling is how Boudet, the host of the true crime podcast would paint them as gumshoes while glorifying their propaganda for ratings in efforts to try and make me and Mrs. Ingram look bad (or crazy, for a lack of a better word) for strongly supporting the homicide theory, a theory his browbeat buddies evidently disagree with. Denying the antecedent and affirming the consequent are two completely different fallacies. I find this relatively amusing considering he clearly provided no information about the case and only stated one-sided, biased propaganda which consisted of spending the vast majority lying about a young woman who is dead, attacking her mother for wanting answers to her death, and myself for publicly supporting the deceased woman and her mother. He allowed reclining researchers with no education in psychology, criminology, social sciences, or even a high school diploma (I believe MayraMM has a GED) to falsely diagnose a grieving mother with Münchausen syndrome by Proxy just because these malicious trolls support a completely different narrative. Even for him, this is a pretty low blow. It is clear by the vast majority of status quo he is doing a favor for the Websleuths administrator by aggrandizing a forensic postulation as veridical while devaluing other conjectures and those of us who support them. 

Furthermore, I must say that I am surprised Boudet would allow internet stalker Michael Odegard on the program, my mother's former friend from Portland who I do not even know. She met him in the now defunct MSN movie chat in the early 2000's. She never met him in person, but only conversed with him via chat on that platform. When I asked her about Mr. Odegard originally after he made a weird hate site about me, she told me she noticed he was a fan of Star Wars. My mother is also a fan of Star Wars. The two started chatting briefly, but it came to end when she blocked him after he said horrible things to her, which she did not reveal in detail. The MSN movie chat was a place where people discussed movies, entertainment, and popular culture. I honestly do not know too much about the MSN movie chat nor the alleged exchange she had with this Odegard guy. I have never frequented the chat, but my mother was an active user in the room when she had free time. This is where she encountered Michael Odegard. My mother emphasized that she has not spoken to him since 2002. This daft individual, Michael Odegard has made many hate blogs about me (if you read my blog, you remember the ‘Sarah Afshar Bimbo’ blog this man created) for no reason. If there is a reason; however, I am guessing it is to get attention from my mom. Odegard started attacking my boyfriend Joe Valo shortly after for simply asking why he was attacking me. Then, Joe asked this nag to refrain from contacting both myself and my mom. You can watch the video here regarding this very sick individual and their menacing. 

To clarify, a stalker is defined as someone who harasses another person and makes unwanted and unwarranted contact with the intent to cause ill will to the subject. If you examine the definition of an internet stalker, it is strongly applied here in many different ways. But I do want to make one thing clear, it is evident Mr. Odegard is severely mentally stunted, so I refuse to glorify someone who is clearly so psychologically unwell and angry. Perhaps he is physically unwell too, I have no clue. I'm not going to wish this individual harm nor do I wish to respond to him directly as I do not know him, but based on what he has said, I do hope he gets the help he needs. Everything he said is not true. I have never ever been on the website Buzzen nor have I ever engaged in any of the chats on that platform. Not exactly sure where this lie came from. I have no idea why this individual perpetuated this lie, but I'm assuming he's using the Sword and Scale podcast as some sort of way to garner internet fame. I will go on record simultaneously and relentlessly letting you know what he has said about me is 100% false, but you are free to make up your mind and believe what you want. 

But going back on topic, I am confused as to why this strange man from Portland was ever featured on a true crime program (or any true crime broadcast about the stalking and murder of Morgan Ingram, for that matter) when he has zero involvement in the Morgan Ingram case nor do his lies hold any value on her case at all. He can hate me for no reason. I do not care because I don't know him, but he knows very well I have never made any contact with him. He knows very well everything he has said about me are complete lies and fabrication. I have never initiated any contact with this individual at all. I have never been a webcam performer nor a sex worker at all; however, as perverted as I believe these types of professions are, you will never see me belittling anyone who chooses this line of work. Odegard knows very well everything he has said about my boyfriend Joe is also completely untrue. Perhaps he is obsessed with becoming famous the same way Luka Magnotta is, as he shares similar qualities to him, I have no clue. His apophenia is nothing more than a deficiency that defines his unfounded ratiocination. I suspect he needs someone to blame his lack of success on. Post hoc ergo propter hoc. Truth be told, Joe and I do not know this man, we have never conversed with him, we do not know his friend Brian, nor have we ever done anything to him. 

With that said, I will voluntarily show my iPhone, my MacBook, and any other smart device I own to authorities to prove that Mr. Odegard, Ms. Martinez, and Ms. Griffith’s allegations about me are completely false and what they have perpetuated about me are complete lies and fabrication. Their epistemic fallacies are nothing more than angsty paranoia and egotism. Simply because Martinez and Griffith disagree with what I have to say about a crime case and believe disparaging me will back up their opinions. Yes folks, just because I believe Morgan Ingram is a victim of foul play, these disgraceful armchair investigators are creating untrue stories about how I harass anyone who disagrees with me, that I created multiple pseudonyms to harass them, and are attempting to diagnose me with various mental disorders because I interviewed Mrs. Ingram. With that said, their latest story of me getting arrested for something I have never done made me laugh, as I have never been arrested ever in my life. They are definitely a few keys short of a piano. The tinfoil is alive and well here folks, but I guess this is entertaining for some of you reading. You have the right to be believe whatever you choose, but pull yourself to the middle and please be smart before taking sides. 

I want to clarify that when independent podcaster Mike Boudet from Sword and Scale originally contacted me in 2014 requesting an interview regarding the stalking and murder of Morgan Ingram, I didn't see his message until years later. He contacted me on Facebook and his message went to the 'other' folder where it sat for years before I actually saw it. If you have Facebook, you too will notice you won't receive every single message someone sends you, as they are filtered. I have never made any contact with the Sword and Scale host, so it was normal for his messages to sit in that particular folder. I would have agreed to do his interview, had I found the message sooner as I have nothing to hide despite their sad, banal attempts to propagandize the Morgan case and those of us who believe Morgan’s case deserves a second look. To be honest, I rarely check that folder when I am on Facebook.  

I would also like to say that I do not go on Sword and Scale nor do I frequent the true crime podcast site. I do; however, find what he did to be remotely low especially what he said about Toni Ingram. She does not have Münchausen syndrome by Proxy either. This is just another pseudo diagnosis and ad hominem retort by an online cabal (which Tricia of Websleuths is the ringleader of) who spend their lives meddling into other's affairs, playing investigator, pretending to be a psychologist, and spreading lies to hide their inferior complex and health issues, as well as, trolling anyone who disagrees with their narratives. I also believe the Websleuths' administrator does this with the intent to promote her crime forum, the same way she begs others for money. I guess evolution can go backwards. I want to also go on record and let you, the world, know that I have never received any money from Toni Ingram. She has never offered any money either. This is more propaganda these angry, internet stalkers with ego driven angst create to devalue those who have a different opinion than they do on the Morgan Ingram crime case. Frankly, you cannot pay me enough money to change my opinion on this case. Morgan Ingram had 7,909 ng of Amitriptyline in her blood stream, which is suspicious alone. 

Moreover, I do not go to any website or blog and voluntarily comment anything regarding Morgan Ingram or her case. Everything I have ever said about Morgan Ingram and this case has always been on this website. And I have added multiple disclaimers that it is my opinion, which I am entitled to. I have only ever commented on Mrs. Ingram's blog and Joe's blog and even then, my website is linked to and from both of their websites. I'm all for freedom of speech, but I am against identity theft and impersonation. If you see any comments from a "Sarah Afshar" commenting about the Morgan Ingram case or making threats to others who share a different opinion on her death, it is not me. If you own a website and you are receiving hateful comments from someone using my name and/or identity, please report them. Make sure to examine the details thoroughly. Look at the IP, the DNS, and the device information. I have a brand new iPhone and always own new technology. Everything I use are Apple products with the exception of other high-tech products that don't use the internet to directly connect. If you are being harassed by someone using my identity, send the information to me so I can document it for my records. I have the resources to take the proper legal action if needed.

Bullying and cyberbullying are actions that I strongly do not support. I want to make this clear because I don't want anyone to get the wrong idea. You may have the preconceived notion that I am a bad person. You have the right to think what you want. What you think of me is truly none of my business. But I also have the ethical and the equitable obligation to defend myself from the lies and untruths perpetuated about me by these people. It is my god given right to tell the truth which I will continue to do. You can choose to believe what you want. Nevertheless, I am asking my readers to avoid visiting any of their websites and blogs, as I do not condone bullying. Please do not attack these people and make them right about me. Remember two wrongs don't make anything right and there are so many wonderful things you can do with any free time you have. You are amazing and I wholeheartedly appreciate every single one of you reading this blog post. Remember, these women are extremely cunning and calculating and it's evident by what they are saying—they are quite disturbed too. Mayra Martinez and Tricia Griffith from Websleuths promote an attitude polarization because they are obsessed with the Morgan Ingram case and have the inability to accept coherent angles that differ from their own. They are extremely obsessed and worried about my theory on this case, but don't seem too confident in their own frame of mind. The only true thing I am guilty of is interviewing Mrs. Ingram and giving her a platform to share her story. 

Yes, I support Toni Ingram, but I have never harassed Mayra Martinez or MayraMM, I have never harassed Tricia from Websleuths, nor have I ever harassed Michael Odegard from Portland or whatever fake alias any of these people create to support their cock and bull stories. And if you are a regular reader of this website, you will see it is actually quite the opposite, as this troll trio (with the diabolical duo being the main culprits to the sham) attempted to make contact with me and bully me into retracting my support of Mrs. Ingram, who I believe is telling the truth. Sadly, their efforts failed. I will continue to always exercise my first amendment rights, as my rights will never be undermined. On that note, this entire charade these armchair sleuths created doesn't shock me due to Boudet's association with them. I do; however, wish him and the other parties the best. Life is far too valuable to waste on hate. I hope everyone involved gets the help they need to move forward with their life because there are far more important things in this life and one of them doesn't revolve around someone's theory on a crime case.